This is an international site for Tasigna® (Nilotinib) and is intended for Health Care Professionals outside the U.S. The information on the site is not country-specific, and may contain information that is outside the approved indications in the country in which you are located. Please contact your local Novartis representative for the latest information specific to your country.

I am a healthcare professional outside the U.S. I am a U.S. resident I am a patient outside the U.S.
Ph+ CML Information
Ph+ CML Treatment Goals
Ongoing Management and Monitoring

ONGOING MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING

Monitoring treatment response

For patients receiving long-term therapy for Ph+ CML, ongoing monitoring is needed to assess whether a patient with Ph+ CML has achieved, or is making progress toward, a desired response to therapy and to ensure that a patient’s treatment is optimized over time.1-3

RQ-PCR quantifies BCR-ABL transcripts in peripheral blood and can detect low levels of residual disease that can remain after CCyR has been achieved.1-3 Rising levels of BCR-ABL transcripts may be an early indicator of poor adherence or emerging resistance.2,3

ELN recommendations support molecular monitoring as a routine standard of care for patients with Ph+ CML, as a way to measure minimal levels of residual disease.1

Monitoring Ph+ CML Treatment Response
Click to enlarge >>

To learn more about RQ-PCR monitoring, visit the CML Alliance.

Importance of adherence

Clinical experience with imatinib has shown us that adherence to oral Ph+ CML therapy is critical to achieving and maintaining the best response.4,5

Two recent clinical trials, the Hammersmith study and the ADAGIO study, demonstrate that adherence to Ph+ CML therapy is critical to achieving and maintaining optimal response.4,5 In fact, evidence demonstrates that missing more than 2 or 3 daily doses of imatinib each month can negatively impact response.4,5

The Hammersmith study: summary results4

Study design

  • 87 English patients completed the study
  • Patients were in CCyR, had Ph+ CML-CP, and had received oral therapy for at least 2 years
  • Adherence was monitored over 90 days

6-year probability of MMR by adherence rate

Click to enlarge >>

Key findings

  • Adherence rate (>90% or ≤90%) was strongly associated with the 6-year probability of MMR, 4-log reduction in BCR-ABL, complete molecular response (CMR), and response at 18 months
    • Probability of MMR for the 23 patients with an adherence rate ≤90% was 13.9%; for the 64 patients with an adherence rate >90%, it was 93.7% (P<0.001)
    • 90% adherence is equivalent to missing approximately 2 to 3 tablets per month

Additional findings

  • Adherence was poor after imatinib dose increase beyond 400 mg per day
  • Young patients were more likely to have a lower adherence rate
  • Unexplained 5-fold increases in BCR-ABL transcript levels were predictive of poor adherence
  • Low adherence was also associated with side effects; health care providers should regularly ask patients if they are experiencing such effects

Conclusions

  • Adherence is critical for achieving molecular responses; adherence rate was the only independent factor that predicted CMR
  • Side effects can impact adherence
  • No CMR was observed when adherence was ≤90%; no MMR was observed when adherence was ≤80%

The ADAGIO study: summary results5


Response achieved by adherence rate

Click to enlarge >>

Study design

  • 169 Belgian patients completed the study
  • Patients had Ph+ CML-CP for an average of 4 years and were receiving oral therapy
  • Adherence (taking medicine every day as directed by the physician) was evaluated over 90 days

Results

  • Adherence greatly influenced response

Additional findings

  • Failure to adhere was related to the patient, physician-patient relationship, and treatment center
  • Patients who function well and those who have taken oral CML therapy for a long time may become more lax about taking their medication

Conclusions

  • More patients failed to adhere to therapy than they, their physicians, and their family members realized
  • Poor adherence was related to lower response rates
  • Health care providers can affect how patients adhere to therapy

References:
1. Baccarani M, Pane F, Saglio G. Monitoring treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2008;93(2):161-169.
2. Radich JP. How I monitor residual disease in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2009;114(16):3376-3381.
3. Hughes T, Deininger M, Hochhaus A, et al. Monitoring CML patients responding to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: review and recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting Bcr-Abl transcripts and kinase domain mutations and for expressing results. Blood. 2006;108(1):28-37.
4. Marin D, Bazeos A, Mahon F-X, et al. Adherence is the critical factor for achieving molecular responses in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who achieve complete cytogenetic responses on imatinib. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(14):2381-2388.
5. Noens L, van Lierde M-A, De Bock R, et al. Prevalence, determinants, and outcomes of nonadherence to imatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: the ADAGIO study. Blood. 2009;113(22):5401-5411.
6. TASIGNA® (nilotinib) Summary of Product Characteristics. Basel, Switzerland: Novartis Pharma AG; June 2011.

TASIGNA Interactive Game

To learn more about RQ-PCR monitoring, visit the CML Alliance.

The favorable tolerability profile of TASIGNA can help newly diagnosed patients maintain therapy.6